David Guzik’s weekly devotional, based on a verse or two from the Bible.

Doing the Right Thing

Doing the Right Thing

And the saying pleased the whole multitude. And they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and the Holy Spirit, and Philip, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicolas, a proselyte from Antioch, whom they set before the apostles; and when they had prayed, they laid hands on them. Then the word of God spread, and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests were obedient to the faith. (Acts 6:5-7)

It’s not easy to deal with problems in the church, especially when one group feels mistreated. But in Acts 6, when there was a dispute over the treatment of Christian widows from a Greek cultural background, the Holy Spirit led the apostles to the right solution.

The solution was so good that it pleased the whole multitude. Both sides were happy!  We can’t say this was a good decision only because the people liked it. Yet, God confirmed the wisdom of the apostles through agreement among the people.

Doing the Right Thing

Luke, the author of Acts, listed the seven men. They all had Greek names, showing that they were probably Hellenists themselves. This showed great sensitivity to the offended Hellenists by appointing Hellenists to take care of the widows’ distribution.

After the seven men were chosen, they prayed for them, and they laid hands on them. It was important to lay hands on them even if their service was mainly for the practical needs of the widows. Practical service is spiritual service. The same Greek word is used for both distribution (Acts 6:1) and ministry (Acts 6:4). The idea behind the word in both places is service, whether in practical ways or spiritual ways.

Look at the wonderful result: the word of God spread, and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly in Jerusalem. Considering all that could have gone wrong when Satan tried to attack the church through division, it’s wonderful that everyone involved did the right thing.

Those with the complaint, the Hellenists, did the right thing: They made the need known, instead of complaining and whining, and they trusted the solution of the apostles.

Those of the other party, the Hebrews, did the right thing: They recognized that the Hellenists had a legitimate need, and they trusted the solution of the apostles.

The seven chosen men did the right thing: They accepted the call to unglamorous service.

The apostles did the right thing: They responded to the need without distracting themselves from their central task.

Satan’s strategy failed. He tried to divide the church, and it did not work. Satan’s second strategy also failed. The apostles were not distracted from the focus of ministry God had for them – to focus on the word of God and on prayer.

Such grace was evident that even a great many of the priests were obedient to the faith – many priests were coming to Jesus!

When we are in seasons of potential division, let’s do the right thing – and see God do His great work.

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 6

Qualified to Serve

Qualified to Serve

Therefore, brethren, seek out from among you seven men of good reputation, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business (Acts 6:3)

Acts 6 tells us there was a problem among the first Christians. Because they were so generous, there was money to help the widows among them who couldn’t support themselves. But there was a disagreement about how that money for the widows was given out.

The Jewish Christians from a Greek or Hellenistic background felt that their widows were neglected compared to the widows among the Christians from a more traditionally Jewish background.

Qualified to Serve

They brought the problem to the apostles and Acts 6:3 says that the apostles spoke to the general group of believers (the “multitude of the disciples” mentioned in Acts 6:2) and pursued the solution with a lot of communication and input from among the people. They even asked those – probably especially those who felt wronged – to seek out from among you men of good character to do this work.

This was a wonderful way to solve the problem. They didn’t throw the complainers out. They didn’t divide into two congregations. They didn’t shun the unhappy people. They didn’t form a committee and endlessly discuss the problem.

No doubt, there were some people who suggested that the apostles should themselves give more direct attention to the distribution of help to the widows. Instead, they delegated and brought more people into doing the work of ministry. Meeting unmet needs is a great way to bring more people into ministry.

But the congregation had to choose men who were of good reputation, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom. These qualifications focused the character of the men to be chosen. The apostles were far more concerned with the internal quality of the men than their outward appearance or image. They didn’t ask for the most popular or best-looking men; they asked for men of character. Because the men were of good reputation, the church family would have confidence in, including the ones who complained.

The idea behind full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom is that these men were to be both spiritually minded and practically minded. This can be a hard combination to find, but they found seven men who were qualified and willing.

However, notice that the apostles said, whom we may appoint. The final decision rested with the apostles. They wanted and valued input from the congregation, but the decision really rested with the apostles.

These seven men were to be chosen for simple, practical service. Yet it was important that they be well qualified for several reasons.

So they could effectively do the job.
So they would well-represent the apostles and the church as a whole.
So their recognized positions would not lead to pride or arrogance.

If you are one of the more practical servants of God’s family, ask God to grow you in these things. If you aren’t then pray for some practical servants you know.

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 6

Work that Pleases God

The Work That Pleases God

Then the twelve summoned the multitude of the disciples and said, “It is not desirable that we should leave the word of God and serve tables…but we will give ourselves continually to prayer and to the ministry of the word.” (Acts 6:2, 4)

A problem threatened to divide the young community of Christians. When one group felt their widows were being neglected by the church’s charitable work, the problem needed to be solved. Yet, the apostles insisted that they were not the ones who should directly meet the need.

Work that Pleases God

The apostles explained, it is not desirable that we should leave the word of God and serve tables. This didn’t concern the actual serving of food and cleaning of dining tables for these widows. It was a figure of speech that meant the handling of the practical work involved in caring for the widows.

The apostles said that they should remain faithful to their central calling, which was prayer and to the ministry of the word. In the big picture, it would be wrong for them to spend their time administrating the practical needs of the widows.

Some people believe that this was evidence of a superior attitude among the twelve; that in their pride, they considered themselves above such work. I don’t think so. Instead, I think they were wise in delegating these responsibilities. God did not call these apostles to be everything and to do everything for the church. God has and will raise up others to serve in other ways.

Thinking about this in a modern context, we can say that a pastor should not have his time consumed in tasks that are essentially “serving tables.” Yet there is something wrong with a pastor who considers such work beneath him.

Yet, the apostles were not to do nothing – they had work to do, saying we will give ourselves continually to prayer and to the ministry of the word. The fact that the apostles busied themselves with prayer and the ministry of the word shows how energetically they did those things and how consuming it is to preach and pray rightly.

The ministry is a lot of work, even apart from administrative headaches. A young man said to Donald Grey Barnhouse, “I’d give the world to be able to teach the Bible like you.” Looking him straight in the eye, Dr. Barnhouse replied: “Good, because that’s exactly what it will cost you.”

To serve the needy widows well and to serve them fairly was real work. To give oneself continually to the word of God and to prayer was also work. One isn’t better than the other; each is good and valuable for God’s kingdom. What we need is a sense of God’s calling and gifting for our life, and a sense of what the Holy Spirit wants us to do. These early Christians understood their calling and did their work – do you? Doing what God has called and gifted you to do is the work that pleases Him.

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 6

Divide and Conquer

Divide and Conquer

Now in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplying, there arose a complaint against the Hebrews by the Hellenists, because their widows were neglected in the daily distribution. (Acts 6:1)

To this point in the Book of Acts, Satan’s attacks against the church came in several different ways. Satan attempted many forms of direct opposition and intimidation, and he also tried to corrupt the church from within. These strategies were all unsuccessful in stopping or slowing the work of the church (Acts 5:42).

Acts 6 sees Satan with another strategy against God’s people: division. The devil hoped to “divide and conquer” through neglect, misunderstanding, and cultural differences.

Divide and Conquer

We can say that with Acts 5 and 6, the good old days were over for the earliest Christians. They now had to deal with internal corruption, and now disputes and potential divisions. How they dealt with those things made all the difference.

It all happened when the number of disciples was multiplying. Seasons of growth and opportunity for the church are also seasons to be on guard against division. Even though the church was growing, they still cared for each other practically. This practical care meant that the Christians organized to help their widows with some kind of daily distribution of food.

As the Christians organized to meet the needs among their own, there arose a complaint against the Hebrews by the Hellenists, because their widows were neglected in the daily distribution. The Hebrews were those Jews more inclined to embrace Jewish culture and they were mostly from Judea. The Hellenists were those Jews more inclined to embrace Greek culture and mostly were from the Diaspora (from all over the Roman Empire).

It’s important to remember that though the titles Hebrews and Hellenists are used, these were Christians, followers of Jesus. They all came from a Jewish background, but they had all embraced Jesus as their Messiah.

Apparently, some of the Christians from a Hellenistic background believed that the widows among the Hebrew Christians received better care. Nothing suggests that the oversight was on purpose. It was a case of some being neglected – an oversight, or the result of bad organization.

Satan loves to use an unintentional wrong to begin a conflict. The Hebrews were right in their hearts, and the Hellenists were right in their facts. These were perfect conditions for a church-splitting conflict.

How would the church handle this? The rest of Acts 6 will explain. But learn this: when today’s church faces division, God’s people have been there before, and God’s word gives us the wisdom to walk through divisive seasons in a way that gives Him glory. We may not take that wisdom – but God offers it to us.

Start by believing the best of your brothers and sisters and realizing that a lot of the hurts we inflict and endure aren’t intentional – yet they still need to be dealt with.

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 6

Worthy to Suffer Shame

Worthy to Suffer Shame

And they agreed with him, and when they had called for the apostles and beaten them, they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go. So they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for His name. And daily in the temple, and in every house, they did not cease teaching and preaching Jesus as the Christ. (Acts 5:40-42)

The prestigious council of important men hoped they could intimidate the apostles into no longer preaching about Jesus. After a strong warning, they called for the apostles and then beat them.

Worthy to Suffer Shame

When we read those words in verse 40, we wonder: “Just how badly were the apostles beaten?” According to some scholars, the word beaten in verse 40 can also be translated skinned; the beating they received stripped the skin off their backs. Another commentator wrote, “It was no soft option; people were known to die from it…. It was meant to be a serious lesson to offenders.”

Yet, even after such a severe beating, the apostles were not intimidated and they were not discouraged. Instead, they left rejoicing. They were not rejoicing that they suffered, but that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for His name. It was a privilege to be associated with Jesus in any circumstance, even to suffer shame.

Because of this joyful association with Jesus, they did not cease teaching and preaching Jesus as the Christ. Whatever beating or shameful treatment the Sanhedrin gave them, it did absolutely no good. The disciples didn’t stop preaching for a moment.

This challenges each of us as followers of Jesus. They continued where we may have stopped. We often find the threat of social rejection is enough to make us keep quiet about who Jesus is and what He did for us. We need to have the apostles’ courage and determination to stand firm for Jesus Christ. We think that suffering shame for Jesus’ name is like a deadly poison that will kill us. Under the work of God’s Spirit, that shame heaped upon us for the sake of Jesus can instead be like a vitamin boost that makes us stronger.

The great preacher of Victorian England, Charles Spurgeon, spoke of this kind of bold heart: “Now, I charge every Christian here to be speaking boldly in Christ’s name, according as he has opportunity, and especially to take care of this tendency of our flesh to be afraid; which leads practically to endeavours to get off easily and to save ourselves from trouble. Fear not; be brave for Christ. Live bravely for him who died lovingly for you.”

I love that last phrase of Spurgeon’s: “Live bravely for him who died lovingly for you.” In the Western World, it is mostly only shame that we suffer for Jesus’ name. Let’s bravely endure what we must bear, standing with and praying for our brothers and sisters across the world who must bear much worse.

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 5

The Gamaliel Principle

The Gamaliel Principle

And now I say to you, keep away from these men and let them alone; for if this plan or this work is of men, it will come to nothing; but if it is of God, you cannot overthrow it–lest you even be found to fight against God. (Acts 5:38-39)

The council was furious. Peter and the rest of the apostles made a bold stand, telling these important men that they would not back down from what God told them to say and do. In response, Acts 5:33 tells us that the men of the council were so angry they wanted to kill these leaders of the early Christian movement.

The Gamaliel Principle

Then, one of the most respected men in the room spoke up. His name was Gamaliel, and he was so esteemed that they gave him the title Rabban, which means “our teacher.” Gamaliel was the grandson of the honored rabbi Hillel, who was the founder of the strongest school of Scripture interpretation of that day.

The council had murder on its mind when Gamaliel raised his voice, and the respected rabbi began with a history lesson. He reminded them all of two fairly recent revolutionaries that sought to lead Israel astray, and they both came to nothing. He then made the point regarding the Christians: if this plan or this work is of men, it will come to nothing; but if it is of God, you cannot overthrow it – lest you even be found to fight against God.

Ever since Gamaliel said those words, some think them wise and say that the “Gamaliel Principle” should guide us. I strongly disagree. Certainly, there are times when “wait and see if this is of God or not” is good advice, but not when it comes to deciding if a religion or spiritual movement is true.

Gamaliel spoke for himself and not for God. There are many religions or spiritual movements that may be considered successful in the sight of man, but they are against God’s truth. Success is not the ultimate measure of truth. There are religions that have existed hundreds of years and have millions of followers, and they are false.

Gamaliel was really a fence sitter. He spoke as if they should wait and see if Jesus and the apostles were really from God. That sound wise and maybe even spiritual, but it was a rejection of the evidence right before him.

But what greater testimony did he need, beyond Jesus’ resurrection and the apostles’ miracles? Gamaliel took a “wait-and-see” attitude when there was plenty of evidence that Jesus Christ was who He said He was, that Jesus rose from the dead, and that the apostles were uniquely sent by God to spread that message.

Gamaliel proposed the test of time, and that is an important test. But more important than the test of time is the test of eternity. Don’t take a “wait and see” approach when God has already given you the evidence of who Jesus is and what He did for you.

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 5

God Rather Than Men

God Rather Than Men

But Peter and the other apostles answered and said: “We ought to obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29)

This was the second time that Peter stood before this council and gave such a bold answer. The previous time was recorded in Acts 4:19-20 when Peter and John said, Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you more than to God, you judge. For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard. Here, the apostles said the same thing in different words when they said, we ought to obey God rather than men.

God Rather Than Men

Those words were a bold declaration. The boldness of Peter and the apostles was a contrast to the Sanhedrin. The men of that council were far more concerned about the opinions of men than obedience to God. Earlier in Acts 5 we read that many common people in Jerusalem had a positive opinion about the disciples of Jesus (Acts 5:13). We also read that the church was growing – many people wanted to become Christians (Acts 5:14). Because of this, the men of the council (who seemed so important and influential) were afraid to punish the apostles. They cared about pleasing the crowd more than pleasing God.

Because of this, what Peter and the apostles said was probably a shock to the men of the council: We ought to obey God rather than men. Those were remarkable words.

The apostles’ response to the council was not a defense, and it was not a plea for mercy. Instead, the apostles simply explained why they did what they did.

In general, the New Testament teaches that we should submit to those in authority over us. Yet submission on the human level is never absolute, and never is more important than the submission we owe to God.

We should obey rulers, but not when they contradict God. The Lord has established structures of authority and submission for the man and woman of God. But, as someone such as John Calvin explained, if a person in a position in authority becomes very disobedient and wicked, they give up the honor of being obeyed.

Every Christian should agree with Peter and the disciples: We ought to obey God rather than men. As Christians, we do submit to rightful authority, and we recognize that this kind of submission goes beyond only doing things that we would otherwise agree with. Yet, when normally rightful authority goes beyond their God-appointed place, our response is we ought to obey God rather than men.

The council that intimidated the apostles and told them to stop preaching was not master over the church – Jesus Christ is Lord. While we respect the work and authority of councils and mayors and governors and other leaders, we understand that Jesus Christ is Lord over the church and when God tells us one thing and human authority tells us something else, we ought to obey God rather than men.

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 5

Bringing Blood Upon

Bringing Blood Upon

And when they had brought them, they set them before the council. And the high priest asked them, saying, “Did we not strictly command you not to teach in this name? And look, you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this Man’s blood on us!” (Acts 5:27-28)

The religious leaders who opposed the apostles of the early church didn’t have the facts on their side. The truth was, Jesus Christ had risen from the dead, showing Himself to many people before He ascended to heaven. The religious leaders couldn’t produce the body of Jesus or discredit the reliable reports of His resurrection. Worst of all, they couldn’t stop the disciples of Jesus from proclaiming the good news of Jesus’ life, sacrificial death on the cross, and resurrection.

Bringing Blood Upon

So, the religious leaders did what many do when the truth isn’t on their side: they hoped intimidation would frighten the opposition into silence. That’s the scene when Acts 5:27 says, they set them before the council. This was another attempt to intimidate the apostles with a display of the council’s institutional authority. The apostles, knowing how God had protected and would continue to protect them, were probably not intimidated or even overly impressed.

Then, the most intimidating man present – the high priest – confronted the followers of Jesus saying, “Did we not strictly command you not to teach in this name?” It was true that they had commanded Peter and John to no longer teach in the name of Jesus (Acts 4:17-18). Yet Peter and John openly told them that they would continue, in obedience to God (Acts 4:19-20).

Then the high priest said to the apostles, “you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine.” This accusation probably made the disciples smile – it was a wonderful testimony of how effective their message had been. Their doctrine, the good news of Jesus Christ, had filled Jerusalem.

Then the high priest said something surprising, claiming the disciples “intend to bring this Man’s blood on us.” First, notice how he referred to Jesus: he called Him “this Man.” One might say that the high priest was so afraid of the power of Jesus that he avoided even saying the Savior’s name!

Yet, the charge that the apostles did intend to bring this Man’s blood upon us is interesting. The high priest no doubt meant that the apostles intended to hold the Jewish leaders responsible, at least in some measure, for the death of Jesus (as in Acts 2:23).

At the same time, we know that the apostles must have desired for the high priest and the other Jewish leaders to come to faith in Jesus, even as some other priests did (Acts 6:7). For certain, the apostles wanted to bring the covering, cleansing blood of Jesus upon the high priest and others in the council.

Perhaps the apostles smiled, nodded, and thought: “Yes, we want you to trust in what Jesus did for you through His death.”

In this sense, is His blood upon you?

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 5

Set Free for a Purpose

Set Free for a Purpose

But at night an angel of the Lord opened the prison doors and brought them out, and said, “Go, stand in the temple and speak to the people all the words of this life.” (Acts 5:19-20)

God was working in a powerful way through the apostles, and the religious leaders in Jerusalem didn’t like it. Acts 5:17-18 says the high priest arrested the apostles and put them all in prison.

They didn’t stay in prison long. We read: an angel of the Lord opened the prison doors. This was easy for God to arrange. Angels are all ministering spirits sent forth to minister for those who will inherit salvation (Hebrews 1:14). God sent forth this angel to minister for the apostles. Locked doors are nothing for God or for those who He uses.

Set Free for a Purpose

To do the work, God sent an angel. Possibly, they only understood this was an angel as they looked back. Angels often come in human appearance, and it may not always be easy to recognize an angel (as in Luke 24:3-7 and Hebrews 13:2).

The angel didn’t just open doors, he also had a message: Go, stand in the temple and speak to the people all the words of this life. The angel freed them from prison, but he wasn’t going to do the work of preaching. That was up to the apostles, and it is also up to us.

Their rescue from prison was wonderful, but for a purpose – so they could continue their work. God didn’t set them free primarily for their safety or comfort. They were set free for a reason. In the future, they were not always delivered.

The later history of these apostles – and others associated with them in the early church – shows that sometimes God delivers by a miracle, sometimes He does not. According to fairly reliable church history and tradition, miraculous angels did not always deliver them.

– Matthew was beheaded with a sword.
– Mark died in Alexandria after being dragged through the streets of the city.
– Luke was hanged on an olive tree in Greece.
– John died a natural death, but they unsuccessfully tried to boil him in oil.
– Peter was crucified upside-down in Rome.
– James was beheaded in Jerusalem.
– James the Less was thrown from a height then beaten with clubs.
– Philip was hanged.
– Bartholomew was whipped and beaten until death.
– Andrew was crucified and preached at the top of his voice to his persecutors until he died.
– Thomas was run through with a spear.
– Jude was killed with the arrows of an executioner.
– Matthias was stoned and then beheaded – as was Barnabas.
– Paul was beheaded in Rome.

This reminds us that we should trust God for miraculous things and wish to see them more and more; but we do this knowing that God also has a purpose when He does not deliver with a miraculous hand. We also see that we, like the apostles, are set free for a purpose – not merely to live for ourselves.

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 5

Strange Miracles

Strange Miracles

So that they brought the sick out into the streets and laid them on beds and couches, that at least the shadow of Peter passing by might fall on some of them. Also a multitude gathered from the surrounding cities to Jerusalem, bringing sick people and those who were tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all healed. (Acts 5:15-16)

These first several chapters of the book of Acts tell the story of the amazing first years of the church, the community of the disciples of Jesus. To this point they had not expanded much beyond Jerusalem, and it was a season of an amazing work of God.

There were amazing – and strange – miracles. People brought the sick out into the streets. People were so convinced of the reality and power of what the Christians believed, they thought they could be healed by the mere touch of Peter’s shadow.

Strange Miracles

That’s what Acts 5:15 says: that at least the shadow of Peter passing by might fall on some of them. Notice it does not specifically say people were healed by Peter’s shadow; it simply tells us people thought it would, and they took action based on this belief. We don’t know for certain if people were actually healed when the shadow of Peter passed over them.

In this case, apparently even the shadow of Peter became a point of contact where people released faith in Jesus as healer. It seems that people well understood what Peter said in Acts 3:12-16: That Jesus heals, even if He does His healing work through His apostles.

It may sound crazy to us that someone could be healed by the touch of a shadow, but we know a touch of Jesus’ clothing healed a woman (Luke 8:44). There wasn’t anything magical in the garment, but it was a way that her faith was released. In the same, there was no power in Peter’s shadow itself, but there was power when a person believed in Jesus to heal them, and the passing of Peter’s shadow may have helped some to believe.

However God chose to bring the healing, there is no doubt that a remarkable work was present, so much so that they were all healed. We shouldn’t miss the connection between the purity preserved in the first part of Acts 5 (with the death of Ananias and the fear of God among the Christians) and the power displayed here. God blessed a pure church with spiritual power.

Notice that a multitude gathered from the surrounding cities to Jerusalem. Notice that this was people coming to Jerusalem instead of the apostles going to them. This was exciting, but not exactly according to the command of Jesus. He told the disciples to go out to Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth (Acts 1:8). The apostles didn’t leave Jerusalem until they were forced by persecution.

With all the miracles happening, perhaps they needed a greater miracle of obedience to Jesus!

Click Here for David’s Written Commentary on Acts 5